Party of Five

Wife, Mom, Student, & Friend

Welcome to Party of Five

This text can be edited from the Theme Editor tab found under Wordpress Admin Dashboard>Themes>Theme Editor >header.php file

California State Bill 777

January 23rd, 2008 by Sarah

I often mention my overwhelming load of homework, but rarely discuss the nature of it. Well today is different because my homework involves a subject that I feel needs to be publicized as much as possible. California State Bill 777. If you have heard little or nothing about this bill let me bring you up to par. Mind you, this is a bill which has already been passed without going to a public vote. As a parent and future educator I find it both frustrating and ridiculous. What SB 777 has done is changed the definition of “gender” in California education code. Where it used to read that your gender was “the biological condition or quality of being a male or female human being”, it no longer does. Now your gender is what you “perceive” yourself to be. Educators are not allowed to challenge a student who may be born male who now feels he is a female (or vice versa). Nor are they allowed to disclose the child’s chosen gender to the parents.

Big deal right? What this means is that males who perceive themselves as females (and vice versa) if not allowed to use the facilities of their choice are now being discriminated against. That if they want to go into a restroom of the opposite sex they must be allowed. That anything that was previously male or female only, is now open to the opposite sex if they perceive them self as that gender. Before you think this is extreme and will never happen, LA Unified has already put it in to place where students of the opposite sex must be allowed into the locker room of their choice as a result of this bill.

What you may find if you start reading up on this is that the advocates of the bill are claiming that SB 777 is necessary to remove discrimination and hate crimes against trans gender and homosexual students. Except this was already very clearly specified in Ed. Code 200, 220, and others if you read them. They state, in many terms, that it is unacceptable to discriminate against students for any of the above reasons and more. So the advocates of SB 777 decided rather than spending their time, energy, and state tax dollars to enforce the laws that we already have in place, they would instead put their energy into re writing the law so as there would be no misunderstanding that “gender” is NOT how you are born.

Before anyone misunderstands my position and thinks that I do not support the rights of these innocent children, or that I would condone hate crimes on a trans gender individual, that is not the case. However our children were already protected under the existing laws which apparently have not been actively enforced every where. What this bill seems uninterested in taking into account however are the rest of the children who are now being put into uncomfortable and unsafe environments. When educators are being told that they are no longer allowed to stop a male student from entering into a female restroom, other students security is being put at risk. There is a lot more to this bill if you are interested in reading up on it hopefully with enough attention to the matter it will be forced to be brought back to a vote or appealed. As parents and citizens we should at least have that right.

Posted in College Life, News, Parenting |

4 Responses

  1. Shelly Says:

    I first heard about this in October and I was surprised that absolutely everyone I asked about it had never heard of it and didn’t believe me that it existed, much less had been passed already. My son spoke to his teachers about it and NONE of them had heard of it. One teacher took it to some board he’s on at VVC and NONE of them had heard about it.
    How is it that something that will affect so many families/children and so many teachers/schools/administrators don’t know about it until it’s a done deal? I believe it’s because there’s a lot more going on behind the scenes than the average citizens know about. It’s not about protecting a small group of children. It’s about changing people’s thinking about a particular group of people and it’s been decided to ingrain the future generations while they’re young. It’s about promoting an agenda. Just my .02

    Thanks for spreading awareness.

    When’s your debate? I’d love to hear how it goes :)

  2. Marlo Says:

    That was some debate wasn’t it!! I’m glad it’s over with. Thanks for being a team member. I think we had a great team and we were able to accomplish what was needed. I’m gonna miss you when you leave our class.

    Marlo’s last blog post..Wordless Wednesday—- “I think I’m gonna barf!”

  3. Jessica The Rock Chick Says:

    Wow. This is very interesting to me because my oldest daughter has had a friend since Kindergarten who was born male, but even as a small child believed he was really female. In about 7th grade, he began dressing as a female and asked that everyone call him by his chosen female name, Vanessa. I think it was a little shocking to the kids (and adults) at first, but they are almost out of high school now and no one even thinks of him as “Danny” anymore. That child is now Vanessa to everyone.

    Since he still is biologically male, I was curious about the bathroom issues at school and my daughter says he uses the girls bathroom and locker room, but he does change clothes in an enclosed bathroom. The school seems to have no issues with this and my daughter says this doesn’t bother her or seemingly anyone else at all.

    This child has never had any problems at school because of this either. Sometimes I have to applaud kids. I think they are much more accepting than we give them credit for. I would expect this kid to have terrible issues at school and there doesn’t seem to be any.

    I’m not sure a hard fast rule or law is the way to deal with these situations. Maybe a case by case basis is a better way to go?

    Jessica The Rock Chick’s last blog post..Here Today!

  4. Postcards from the Funny Farm » Blog Safari 1-26-08 Says:

    [...] Party of Five: Assembly bill that will put males and females in the same school bathrooms. [...]

Leave a Comment

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.